Langdell regularized entrance requirements, championed the Socratic method of teaching, and expanded the curriculum to 3 years Reed : — Law reviews were an ideal outlet, as Clarence Ashley : 12 , dean of New York University Law School would argue: In short, there should be a demand for broad legal scholarship going beyond the requirements of actual practice, and to create this demand an interest should gradually be awakened among such students as have time and inclination to pursue courses of this character ….
We are all indebted to the Harvard Law Review , and its articles have proved an inspiration in the direction I have indicated. Thus, innovations at law schools, the growth of universities, and the rise of scholarship as a signal of university quality set the stage for law reviews to be perceived as legitimate endeavors that boosted the reputation of their host schools.
Ties to the broader field of legal periodicals also contributed to law reviews' emergence. American legal periodicals originated in with the American Law Journal and Miscellaneous Repertory Brainerd Until about the s, legal periodicals mostly consisted of commentaries on recent court decisions, which were proliferating rapidly Friedman : — Practicing lawyers did not have the time or money to collect and read the increasing volume of case reports.
Legal periodicals helped by reporting in whole, summarizing, or commenting on important cases. In , however, West Publishing Co. They followed the format established by the American Law Review , which took a more scholarly and national approach than prior legal periodicals Swygert and Bruce The second law review was the Columbia Jurist , founded in Albany's lasted just 1 year and Columbia's one and a half years.
My reading of the only surviving issue of Albany Law School Journal vol. Others, including those at Columbia —; —; —present and the University of Iowa —; —present , made several attempts before finding enduring success.
Its founding in and subsequent development demonstrates the importance of ties between early law reviews and related fields: law schools, the university, and legal practice. After this point, law reviews cohered around the form and practices set by the Harvard model. Yet we are not without hopes that the Review may be serviceable to the profession at large. Editors : First, exemplifying the close connection between fledgling law reviews and the field of legal practice, Harvard alumni practitioners were a primary intended audience. Could we not rely upon them to underwrite the Review as annual subscribers?
Why would faculty, at Harvard and elsewhere, cede control of these outlets so easily? Second, most law faculty maintained busy schedules as practicing attorneys in addition to teaching duties Stevens : Third, law professors were also facing major increases in the hours they were required to devote to instruction Reed : — Practically speaking, then, law faculty had neither the time, experience with publications, nor fully formed identities as scholars to devote efforts at managing journals.
Equally important, early law reviews were perceived as practical vehicles for communicating with practitioner audiences and training future lawyers. In , it reorganized its governance structure and policies upon incorporation of the Harvard Law Review Association. Why do they all start out with a fanfare of three or four leading articles and then dribble back diminuendo through variations on the same sort of theme until they reach the book reviews at the end? The reorganization at Harvard Law Review thus marked a critical juncture for law review's developmental path.
The contingency, uncertainty, and variation that characterized founding conditions and structures of the earliest law reviews gave way to a clearly established model. Other law schools quickly established law reviews according to the Harvard model. Despite input from faculty at a few journals Updegraff , student control of law reviews begun after was the norm. This was necessary for institutionalization and field emergence see Colyvas and Jonsson And in order to be a legitimate law review, a law school needed to publish it and students needed to lead it.
In the aggregate, though, core structures and practices have persisted see Table 1.
The Soft Budget Constraint — The Emergence, Persistence and Logic of an Institution. Authors; (view Persistence and Change during Institutional Reform. The Soft Budget Constraint: The Emergence, Persistence and Logic of an Institution: Gun E. Skoog, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London.
The mean number of book reviews dropped over the middle of the century from Despite this persistence, open contestation of the institution, starting with Rodell's famous critique, began appearing with increasing frequency in the s. Of the critical articles, 90 were written by faculty, 21 by practitioners, and 12 by students.
Table 2 shows descriptive statistics and pairwise correlations. Logistic regression results identify the roles of field actors who contest law reviews and show that law review's legitimacy, reflected in the sentiment of those who write about law reviews, has decreased in the modern era. Qualitative analysis of database articles and other archival sources e. Chief among them is the perceived unfairness of publication decisions e. Complaints of perceived unfairness based on prestige also extend to editing. Ties to external fields reveal how the law review can withstand such internal field criticism and resist change.
Overall, my quantitative analysis reveals that attorneys and judges collectively, practitioners are less supportive of law reviews than students, but they are more supportive compared to faculty see also Wise et al. Students invariably point to this as justification, followed by practitioners, then faculty. Mertz Marketing materials of law reviews and law schools also trumpet lawyerly training as a primary purpose of law reviews.
Finally, law reviews are increasingly disconnected to legal practice in terms of actual use by practitioners, both as producers who write in law reviews and as consumers who read them compare Editors to Posner This perceived disconnect from legal practice, perhaps paradoxically, helps law reviews resist change. As a principal channel through which law students establish status hierarchies, law review confers power onto members and thereby incentivizes them to resist change. First, the pressure to publish scholarship has increased in law schools over the past 60 years AALS ; Hibbitts ; Zenoff and Moody Indeed, as tenure standards of other disciplines infiltrated law schools, scholarship became the most important requirement for achieving tenure and status within the legal academy Abrams ; Lilly For instance, a single published article was still common among tenured law professors in the early s.
In the last three decades, however, publishing multiple articles, particularly in law reviews, has become the norm for tenure AALS Just as rising tenure standards reflect the importance of scholarly publications for promotion, so too does the academic labor market's increased emphasis on scholarly publications when hiring new law faculty Redding ; Denning et al. This guarantees placement at the most prestigious journal possible. Discontinuing it at any one law school could harm that school's legitimacy without a critical mass of other law schools following suit.
Such isomorphic change toward the journal model of other disciplines never took place, however.
The faculty journal never published its first issue. Consistent with my argument, pressures from other fields thwarted the change effort. Dean Vorenberg suspended journal plans while he searched for a new editor. Months passed with no progress. He offered familiar justifications for his claims: law reviews provide scholarly products via unpaid student labor and valuable experience for future attorneys Chang Griswold proved prophetic.
Tribe personal communication, June 3, PRSM's popularity remained low among authors from the start Robertson , and the number of participating law reviews stalled at around 20 after A diverse mix of scholarly approaches from university disciplines has entered the legal academy during this era.
Of course, interdisciplinary legal scholarship is not totally new to legal academia; obvious links exist between some interdisciplinary schools and Legal Realism of the s and s Garth and Sterling Since the s, however, law schools have witnessed an influx of interdisciplinary approaches Minda ; Tomlins This has coincided with a huge increase of law professors with PhDs. In , the prevalence of PhDs within law faculties was so low that Fossum did not include PhD as a category of degrees in her profile of law professors. Most recently, 21 percent of a sample of new law faculty hired from to had a PhD LoPucki At elite law schools, the increasing presence of faculty PhDs has been most pronounced McCrary et al.
For example, empirical scholarship in law reviews has steadily increased, particularly since the late s Diamond and Mueller ; Heise Kornai J. L'exemple de la Hongrie, , Paris : Gallimard. Kraft E.
Levaggi R. Magee K.
Majumdar S. Maskin E. Moesen W. Nelson R. Nett L. Pinto B. C: The World Bank. Excerpts published in Transition, Vol. Prell M. PUN W. Qian Y. Raiser M. Rochet J.
Say J. Newbery, Ed. Schaffer M. Simon H. Skoog G. Wagener, Ed. Tornell A. Shackle and J. Vahabi M.